The Inspector General of the U.S. Department of Health and Human
Services reports that the contribution organ donor registries
can make to increasing the number of donors appears "limited,"
and cautions states to "avoid over-promising" on what
registries can do to increase the supply of organs for the 80,000
Americans awaiting a transplant.
The IG's office said the growing number of registries being set
up by states and organ procurement organizations (OPOs) could
"offer numerous advantages compared to traditional methods
for increasing donations," but added that thus far their
"measurable impact on increasing the number of organ donors
has been marginal."
The Inspector General, in response to a request from HHS Secretary
Tommy Thompson, took a look at the donor registries being operated
by 14 states and two OPOs in other states. Six other states have
recently passed laws establishing registries, although in two
states they have not received start-up funding.
The IG reported that its analysis of data showed that "families
of registry enrollees give consent for donation at a much higher
rate than do families of non-enrollees."
But, the report said, only about one quarter of the population
in states with registries has actually enrolled, and enrollees
constitute "a relatively small portion of all donors"
at the OPOs in those states.
"Even those registries in place for many years contain
a minority of the state's population," the report said.
The IG also noted that while one of the attractions of establishing
registries was the idea that they could more easily provide information
about out-of-state potential donors, "the number of such
donors is small."
The report concluded that the most useful role that DHHS could
play would be to (1) act as a clearing house to support information
sharing among registries, and provide technical assistance; and
(2) support research projects to see "what more can be done
to tap registries' potential."
The Association of Organ Procurement Organizations (AOPO), which
represents all 59 of the nation's OPOs, said it felt the report
"possibly understates the potential future value of registries.
"AOPO believes that it is too soon in the evolution of registries
in states to make a deterimination that they are not effective,"
said AOPO Executive Director Paul Schwab. "This is particularly
the case if registries are increasingly considered as documentation
of consent rather than simply as declaration of intent."