A U.S. nephrologist and a British bioethicist have suggested
in the American Journal of Kidney Diseases that a "conscription"
system of organ donation -- where viable organs are taken from
the recently deceased without permission of the next-of-kin --
would alleviate the growing organ shortage and prevent needless
deaths.
Dr. Aaron Spital of Strong Memorial Hospital in Rochester, NY,
and Charles A. Erin of the University of Manchester in the United
Kingdom argue that mandatory cadaveric organ donation is "preferable"
because it would save more lives, avoid the need of approaching
bereaved families, and unlike proposals to provide compensation
for donation, would risk no "exploitation of the poor for
the benefit of the rich."
"Under this plan, all usable organs would be removed from
recently deceased people and made available for transplantation;
consent would be neither required nor requested and, with the
possible exception of people with religious objections, opting-out
would not be possible," the authors suggest in the opinion
article.
Several leaders of organ donational organizations quickly observed
that such a proposal had absolutely no chance of moving forward
in the United States.