|
People in India who sold one of their kidneys for use
in an organ transplant often wound up worse off both financially
and from a health standpoint, according to a new study reported
in the Journal of the American Medical Association.
Even though
India outlawed the sale of kidneys in 1994, the practice continues
there and in a number of other developing countries.
The study
by Dr. Madhav Goyal of the Geisinger Health System, based on interviews
in 2001 with 305 kidney donors in the city of Chennai (formerly
Madras) in southern India, provides strong ammunition for opponents
of various proposals to provide compensation for donors in the
United States.
The study
makes it clear, for example, that the primary motivation of "almost
all" of those selling their kidneys was to pay off debts
(96 percent). Only one in 20 expressed any altruistic interest
in helping a sick person with kidney disease.
But the sellers
received an average of only $1,070 for a kidney (about one-third
less than they were promised). What's more, the average family
income declined by one third after the kidney was removed, and
the number of families living below the poverty line actually
increased.
And unlike
living kidney donors in the United States, almost half of the
donors in India reported a serious decline in their health. Half
of the participants complained of persistent pain at the nephrectomy
site and one-third complained of long-term back pain.
Perhaps most
telling was the response of donors who were asked what advice
they would give someone else with the same reasons they had for
selling a kidney.
Four out of
five of the Indian donors said they would not recommend selling
a kidney.
"The
sale of kidneys by poor people in India does not lead to a tangible
benefit for the seller. The value of paying for donations must
be reexamined in light of these findings," said Goyal. "Although
patients with kidney failure deserve access to optimal treatment,
such treatment should not be based on the exploitation of poor
people."
Dr. David
J. Rothman, a medical ethicist at Columbia University, said in
the same Journal that the study should sharpen the debate in the
U.S. over offering financial incentives as a way to increase the
rate of organ donation.
"Goyal
explodes the proposition that the sale is a win-win situation
that benefits buyer and seller," Rothman wrote.
Other
sources: Journal of the American Medical Association
|